AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 2x more core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1152 MHz
• Around 82% higher boost clock speed: 2581 MHz vs 1417 MHz
• 6071.7x more texture fill rate: 413.0 GTexel/s vs 68.02 GTexel / s
• 3.3x more pipelines: 2560 vs 768
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
• 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
• 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19824 vs 5320
• 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 946 vs 345
• 5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 100473 vs 19914
• 6.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 349.422 vs 54.188
• 6.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7129.567 vs 1159.046
• 6.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 34.064 vs 5.507
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 197.183 vs 82.067
• 5.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1699.337 vs 293.638
• Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15315 vs 8059
• 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 18062 vs 3579
• 15.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 50772 vs 3358
• Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15315 vs 8059
• 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 18062 vs 3579
• 15.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 50772 vs 3358
• Around 10% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2435 vs 2219

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

• 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 230 Watt
• 3.5x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	19824 5320
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	946 345
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	100473 19914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	349.422 54.188
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7129.567 1159.046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	34.064 5.507
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	197.183 82.067
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1699.337 293.638
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15315 8059
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18062 3579
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	50772 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15315 8059
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18062 3579
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	50772 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2435 2219

Compare specifications (specs)