AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 3.2x more core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 720 MHz
- 3.4x more boost clock speed: 2581 MHz vs 758 MHz
- 5124.1x more texture fill rate: 413.0 GTexel/s vs 80.6 billion / sec
- Around 90% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1344
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1800 MHz
- 6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19824 vs 3278
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 946 vs 351
- 10.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 100473 vs 9444
- 12.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 349.422 vs 28.081
- 8.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7129.567 vs 879.575
- 12.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 34.064 vs 2.823
- 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 197.183 vs 40.155
- 17x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1699.337 vs 99.75
- 12.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15315 vs 1263
- 7.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 18062 vs 2409
- 16.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 50772 vs 3111
- 12.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15315 vs 1263
- 7.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 18062 vs 2409
- 16.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 50772 vs 3111
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 Mar 2021 vs 4 June 2012 |
Core clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 720 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz vs 758 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s vs 80.6 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1344 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19824 vs 3278 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 946 vs 351 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 100473 vs 9444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 349.422 vs 28.081 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7129.567 vs 879.575 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 34.064 vs 2.823 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 197.183 vs 40.155 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1699.337 vs 99.75 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15315 vs 1263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 vs 2409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 vs 3111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15315 vs 1263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 vs 2409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 vs 3111 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 230 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19824 | 3278 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 946 | 351 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 100473 | 9444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 349.422 | 28.081 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7129.567 | 879.575 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 34.064 | 2.823 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 197.183 | 40.155 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1699.337 | 99.75 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15315 | 1263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 | 2409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 | 3111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15315 | 1263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 | 2409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 | 3111 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2435 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Navi 22 | GK104 |
Launch date | 3 Mar 2021 | 4 June 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $479 | $310.50 |
Place in performance rating | 51 | 1018 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Price now | $499.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.46 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz | 758 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 2321 MHz | 720 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1344 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s | 80.6 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 17200 million | 3,540 million |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,038 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 API |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 384 GB/s | 115.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
SLI | ||
TXAA |