AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1240 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 275 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

• 4.9x more texture fill rate: 268.8 GTexel / s vs 55 GTexel / s
• 5.8x more pipelines: 4096 vs 704
• 4.9x better floating-point performance: 8,602 gflops vs 1,760 gflops
• 4.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9484 vs 2106
• Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 799 vs 518
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 155.307 vs 40.991
• 9.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3431.249 vs 364.578
• 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.49 vs 3.196
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.089 vs 54.784
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 857.575 vs 262.35
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8673 vs 3455
• 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8925 vs 1857
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 3107
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8673 vs 3455
• 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8925 vs 1857
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 3107
• 4.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5170 vs 1201

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2106 9484
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	518 799
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.991 155.307
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	364.578 3431.249
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.196 12.49
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.784 153.089
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	262.35 857.575
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3455 8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1857 8925
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3107 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3455 8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1857 8925
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3107 3361
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1201 5170

Compare specifications (specs)