AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 versus AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

versus

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 7 mois plus tard
Environ 18% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1240 MHz versus 1050 MHz
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
4.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 275 Watt

Date de sortie	13 February 2018 versus 24 June 2015
Vitesse augmenté	1240 MHz versus 1050 MHz
Processus de fabrication	14 nm versus 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt versus 275 Watt

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 268.8 GTexel / s versus 55 GTexel / s
5.8x plus de pipelines: 4096 versus 704
4.9x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 8,602 gflops versus 1,760 gflops
4.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9484 versus 2106
Environ 54% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 799 versus 518
3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 155.307 versus 40.991
9.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3431.249 versus 364.578
3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.49 versus 3.196
2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.089 versus 54.784
3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 857.575 versus 262.35
2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8673 versus 3455
4.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8925 versus 1857
Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 versus 3107
2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8673 versus 3455
4.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8925 versus 1857
Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 versus 3107
4.3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5170 versus 1201

Caractéristiques
Taux de remplissage de la texture	268.8 GTexel / s versus 55 GTexel / s
Pipelines	4096 versus 704
Performance á point flottant	8,602 gflops versus 1,760 gflops
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	9484 versus 2106
PassMark - G2D Mark	799 versus 518
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	155.307 versus 40.991
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	3431.249 versus 364.578
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	12.49 versus 3.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	153.089 versus 54.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	857.575 versus 262.35
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8673 versus 3455
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8925 versus 1857
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361 versus 3107
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8673 versus 3455
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8925 versus 1857
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361 versus 3107
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	5170 versus 1201

Comparer les références

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2106

9484

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

518

799

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

40.991

155.307

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

364.578

3431.249

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.196

12.49

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

54.784

153.089

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

262.35

857.575

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3455

8673

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1857

8925

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3107

3361

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3455

8673

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1857

8925

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3107

3361

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

1201

5170

Nom	AMD Radeon RX Vega 11	AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
PassMark - G3D Mark	2106	9484
PassMark - G2D Mark	518	799
Geekbench - OpenCL	14583
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	40.991	155.307
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	364.578	3431.249
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.196	12.49
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	54.784	153.089
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	262.35	857.575
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3455	8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1857	8925
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3107	3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3455	8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1857	8925
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3107	3361
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1201	5170

Comparer les caractéristiques

	AMD Radeon RX Vega 11	AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Essentiel
Architecture	GCN 5.0	GCN 3.0
Nom de code	Raven	Fiji
Date de sortie	13 February 2018	24 June 2015
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	795	220
Genre	Desktop	Desktop
Conception		AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series
Prix de sortie (MSRP)		$649
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1240 MHz	1050 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	300 MHz
Performance á point flottant	1,760 gflops	8,602 gflops
Processus de fabrication	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	704	4096
Taux de remplissage de la texture	55 GTexel / s	268.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	275 Watt
Compte de transistor	4,940 million	8,900 million
Unités de Compute		64
Stream Processors		4096
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Soutien de DisplayPort
Soutien de Dual-link DVI
Eyefinity
HDMI
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity		6
VGA
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	IGP	PCIe 3.0 x16
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	None	2x 8-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire
Soutien de bus		PCIe 3.0
Longeur		191 mm
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Mantle
OpenCL		2.0
Mémoire
Mémoire partagé	0
Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM)
RAM maximale		4 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire		512 GB/s
Largeur du bus mémoire		4096 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire		1050 MHz
Genre de mémoire		High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
FRTC
HD3D
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)