AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 vs NVIDIA GeForce 315M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and NVIDIA GeForce 315M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

NVIDIA GeForce 315M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 1 month(s) later
11.3x more texture fill rate: 55 GTexel / s vs 4.85 GTexel / s
44x more pipelines: 704 vs 16
45.4x better floating-point performance: 1,760 gflops vs 38.78 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
18.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2106 vs 115
14.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 518 vs 36
5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14583 vs 2910
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3107 vs 1401
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3107 vs 1401

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 February 2018 vs 5 January 2011
Texture fill rate	55 GTexel / s vs 4.85 GTexel / s
Pipelines	704 vs 16
Floating-point performance	1,760 gflops vs 38.78 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 40 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2106 vs 115
PassMark - G2D Mark	518 vs 36
Geekbench - OpenCL	14583 vs 2910
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3107 vs 1401
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3107 vs 1401

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 315M

4x more core clock speed: 1212 MHz vs 300 MHz
4.6x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 65 Watt

Core clock speed	1212 MHz vs 300 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	14 Watt vs 65 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 315M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2106

115

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

518

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

14583

2910

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3107

1401

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3107

1401

Name	AMD Radeon RX Vega 11	NVIDIA GeForce 315M
PassMark - G3D Mark	2106	115
PassMark - G2D Mark	518	36
Geekbench - OpenCL	14583	2910
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	40.991
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	364.578
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	54.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	262.35
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3455
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1857
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3107	1401
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3455
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1857
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3107	1401
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1201

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX Vega 11	NVIDIA GeForce 315M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 5.0	Tesla 2.0
Code name	Raven	GT218
Launch date	13 February 2018	5 January 2011
Place in performance rating	795	1636
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1240 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1212 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,760 gflops	38.78 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	704	16
Texture fill rate	55 GTexel / s	4.85 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	14 Watt
Transistor count	4,940 million	260 million
CUDA cores		16
Gigaflops		73
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	IGP	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Bus support		PCI-E 2.0
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	10.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.1
Memory
Shared memory	0	0
Memory bandwidth		12.8 GB / s
Memory bus width		64 Bit
Memory type		GDDR3, DDR3
Technologies
CUDA
HybridPower
Power management		8.0