AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 34% higher texture fill rate: 55 GTexel / s vs 41.0 GTexel / s
• Around 57% higher pipelines: 704 vs 448
• Around 34% better floating-point performance: 1,760 gflops vs 1,311.7 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 210 Watt
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.991 vs 34.324
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 262.35 vs 121.575

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

• 2.4x more core clock speed: 732 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1181.463 vs 364.578
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.978 vs 3.196
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.37 vs 54.784
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4590 vs 3455
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2133 vs 1857
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 3107
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4590 vs 3455
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2133 vs 1857
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 3107
• 3.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4197 vs 1201

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.991 34.324
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	364.578 1181.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.196 3.978
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.784 58.37
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	262.35 121.575
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3455 4590
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1857 2133
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3107 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3455 4590
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1857 2133
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3107 3333
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1201 4197

Compare specifications (specs)