AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1240 MHz vs 1033 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 140 Watt
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 518 vs 487
• Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14583 vs 11364
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.991 vs 30.505
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.196 vs 3.085
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 54.784 vs 35.416
• 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 262.35 vs 62.69

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

• 3.3x more core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 43% higher texture fill rate: 78.4 billion / sec vs 55 GTexel / s
• Around 36% higher pipelines: 960 vs 704
• Around 13% better floating-point performance: 1,981 gflops vs 1,760 gflops
• Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4017 vs 2106
• Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.293 vs 364.578
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3581 vs 3455
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 1857
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 vs 3107
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3581 vs 3455
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 1857
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 vs 3107
• Around 9% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1307 vs 1201

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2106 4017
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	518 487
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	14583 11364
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.991 30.505
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	364.578 705.293
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.196 3.085
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.784 35.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	262.35 62.69
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3455 3581
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1857 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3107 3365
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3455 3581
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1857 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3107 3365
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1201 1307

Compare specifications (specs)