AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 55 GTexel / s vs 48.0 billion / sec
• Around 40% better floating-point performance: 1,760 gflops vs 1,256 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 100 Watt
• Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 527 vs 382
• Around 36% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14665 vs 10752
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.991 vs 18.251
• Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.196 vs 1.9
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 54.784 vs 36.241
• 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 262.35 vs 62.895

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

• 2x more core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 36% higher pipelines: 960 vs 704
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2745 vs 2120
• Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 665.068 vs 364.578
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4175 vs 3455
• Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3383 vs 1857
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 vs 3107
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4175 vs 3455
• Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3383 vs 1857
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 vs 3107

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2120 2745
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	527 382
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	14665 10752
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.991 18.251
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	364.578 665.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.196 1.9
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.784 36.241
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	262.35 62.895
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3455 4175
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1857 3383
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3107 3334
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3455 4175
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1857 3383
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3107 3334

Compare specifications (specs)