AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1240 MHz vs 1085 MHz
• Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 55 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
• Around 10% higher pipelines: 704 vs 640
• Around 27% better floating-point performance: 1,760 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14583 vs 11526
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.196 vs 2.933
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 54.784 vs 26.532
• Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 262.35 vs 133.458
• 10.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1201 vs 117

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

• 3.4x more core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 8% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 65 Watt
• Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 2106
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 518
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 40.991
• Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 364.578
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 3455
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 1857
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 3107
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 3455
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 1857
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 3107

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2106 3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	518 521
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	14583 11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.991 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	364.578 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.196 2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.784 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	262.35 133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3455 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1857 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3107 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3455 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1857 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3107 3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1201 117

Compare specifications (specs)