AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and NVIDIA Quadro K5000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 9% better floating-point performance: 1,760 gflops vs 1,615 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 100 Watt
• Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 518 vs 361
• 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14583 vs 5107
• Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.991 vs 24.713
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.196 vs 2.189
• Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 54.784 vs 28.929
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 262.35 vs 68.712

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

• 2x more core clock speed: 601 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 67.31 GTexel / s vs 55 GTexel / s
• Around 91% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 704
• Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2806 vs 2106
• Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 685.1 vs 364.578
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4825 vs 3455
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 vs 1857
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3107
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4825 vs 3455
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 vs 1857
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3107

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2106 2806
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	518 361
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	14583 5107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.991 24.713
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	364.578 685.1
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.196 2.189
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.784 28.929
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	262.35 68.712
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3455 4825
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1857 3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3107 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3455 4825
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1857 3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3107 3353

Compare specifications (specs)