AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL vs AMD Radeon HD 6990

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL and AMD Radeon HD 6990 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 12% higher core clock speed: 931 MHz vs 830 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 5.8x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 375 Watt
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3632 vs 3013
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 58.971 vs 17.264
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1235.247 vs 840.452
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.134 vs 1.76
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 75.289 vs 53.903
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6318 vs 4562
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6318 vs 4562

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6990

• 3.5x more texture fill rate: 2x 79.7 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 80.88 GTexel / s
• 2.4x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 1280
• Around 97% better floating-point performance: 2x 2,549.8 gflops vs 2,588 gflops
• 3.6x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1400 MHz
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 630 vs 481
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 265.302 vs 252.311
• Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 2070
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1514
• Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 2070
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1514

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6990

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3632 3013
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	481 630
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	58.971 17.264
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1235.247 840.452
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.134 1.76
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.289 53.903
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	252.311 265.302
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6318 4562
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2070 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1514 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6318 4562
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2070 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1514 3356

Compare specifications (specs)