AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL and NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 26% higher core clock speed: 931 MHz vs 738 MHz
• 6.8x more texture fill rate: 80.88 GTexel / s vs 11.81 GTexel / s
• 40x more pipelines: 1280 vs 32
• 22x better floating-point performance: 2,588 gflops vs 117.5 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
• 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
• Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1008 MHz
• 23.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3899 vs 166
• 9.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 474 vs 51
• Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 75.289 vs 38.948

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM

• Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 65 Watt
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 179.899 vs 58.971
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1813.265 vs 1235.247
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.817 vs 5.195
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 757.451 vs 252.311
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3689 vs 2070
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1731 vs 1514
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3689 vs 2070
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1731 vs 1514

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3899 166
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	474 51
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	58.971 179.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1235.247 1813.265
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.195 13.817
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.289 38.948
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	252.311 757.451
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2070 3689
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1514 1731
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2070 3689
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1514 1731

Compare specifications (specs)