AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL vs ATI FirePro V9800

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL and ATI FirePro V9800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL

ATI FirePro V9800

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 10% higher core clock speed: 931 MHz vs 850 MHz
Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 80.88 GTexel / s vs 68.0 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
3.8x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 250 Watt
Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3899 vs 2727
6.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 58.971 vs 9.718
Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1235.247 vs 738.1
6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.195 vs 0.867
2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 75.289 vs 27.153
2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 252.311 vs 118.756

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 February 2018 vs 9 September 2010
Core clock speed	931 MHz vs 850 MHz
Texture fill rate	80.88 GTexel / s vs 68.0 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3899 vs 2727
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	58.971 vs 9.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1235.247 vs 738.1
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	5.195 vs 0.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	75.289 vs 27.153
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	252.311 vs 118.756

Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V9800

Around 25% higher pipelines: 1600 vs 1280
Around 5% better floating-point performance: 2,720.0 gflops vs 2,588 gflops
3.3x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 1400 MHz
Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 655 vs 474

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	1600 vs 1280
Floating-point performance	2,720.0 gflops vs 2,588 gflops
Memory clock speed	4600 MHz vs 1400 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	655 vs 474

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V9800

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3899

2727

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

474

655

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

58.971

9.718

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1235.247

738.1

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5.195

0.867

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

75.289

27.153

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

252.311

118.756

Name	AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL	ATI FirePro V9800
PassMark - G3D Mark	3899	2727
PassMark - G2D Mark	474	655
Geekbench - OpenCL	19455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	58.971	9.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1235.247	738.1
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	5.195	0.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	75.289	27.153
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	252.311	118.756
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6318
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2070
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1514
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6318
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2070
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1514
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2091

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL	ATI FirePro V9800
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	TeraScale 2
Code name	Polaris 22	Cypress
Launch date	1 February 2018	9 September 2010
Place in performance rating	629	627
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$3,499
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1011 MHz
Core clock speed	931 MHz	850 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,588 gflops	2,720.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	1280	1600
Texture fill rate	80.88 GTexel / s	68.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count		2,154 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	IGP	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length		267 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	204.8 GB / s	147.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	1024 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1400 MHz	4600 MHz
Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Shared memory	0