NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX Vega

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX Vega videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• 220.2x more texture fill rate: 67.65 GTexel/s vs 307.2 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
• 7.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15760 vs 2094
• 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 vs 2391
• 7.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15760 vs 2094
• 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 vs 2391

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega

• Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 712 MHz
• Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1057 MHz
• 2x more pipelines: 4096 vs 2048
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
• Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12297 vs 6841
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 882 vs 403
• Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68096 vs 50643
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 205.048 vs 165.993
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3986.188 vs 1980.866
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.999 vs 14.641
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.468 vs 135.641
• Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1291.445 vs 745.481
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8455 vs 8045
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8455 vs 8045

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6841 12297
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	403 882
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	50643 68096
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	165.993 205.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1980.866 3986.188
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.641 17.999
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	135.641 215.468
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	745.481 1291.445
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15760 2094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8923 2391
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8045 8455
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15760 2094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8923 2391
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8045 8455

Compare specifications (specs)