AMD Radeon RX Vega vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega and NVIDIA Quadro P5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Video outputs and ports, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 307.2 GTexel / s vs 277.3 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 4096 vs 2048
- Around 11% better floating-point performance: 9,830 gflops vs 8,873 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 882 vs 672
- Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68096 vs 52901
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3986.188 vs 2698.914
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.999 vs 14.206
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.468 vs 140.845
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1291.445 vs 927.006
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8455 vs 3077
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8455 vs 3077
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 April 2017 vs 1 October 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 307.2 GTexel / s vs 277.3 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2048 |
Floating-point performance | 9,830 gflops vs 8,873 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 882 vs 672 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68096 vs 52901 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3986.188 vs 2698.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.999 vs 14.206 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.468 vs 140.845 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1291.445 vs 927.006 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8455 vs 3077 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8455 vs 3077 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5000
- Around 61% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- 4.5x more memory clock speed: 9016 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12631 vs 12297
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 223.558 vs 205.048
- 7.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15489 vs 2094
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3409 vs 2391
- 7.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15489 vs 2094
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3409 vs 2391
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 9016 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12631 vs 12297 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 223.558 vs 205.048 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15489 vs 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3409 vs 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15489 vs 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3409 vs 2391 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12297 | 12631 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 882 | 672 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68096 | 52901 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.048 | 223.558 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3986.188 | 2698.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.999 | 14.206 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.468 | 140.845 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1291.445 | 927.006 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2094 | 15489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2391 | 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8455 | 3077 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2094 | 15489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2391 | 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8455 | 3077 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1326 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.3 | Pascal |
Code name | Greenland | GP104 |
Launch date | 1 April 2017 | 1 October 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599.99 | $2,499 |
Place in performance rating | 242 | 245 |
Price now | $409.99 | $1,699.99 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 38.94 | 8.38 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 9,830 gflops | 8,873 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 4096 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 307.2 GTexel / s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB / s | 192 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 9016 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |