AMD Radeon RX Vega versus NVIDIA Quadro P5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX Vega and NVIDIA Quadro P5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Mémoire, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 11% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 307.2 GTexel / s versus 277.3 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 4096 versus 2048
- Environ 11% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 9,830 gflops versus 8,873 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 882 versus 672
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 68096 versus 52901
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3986.188 versus 2698.914
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.999 versus 14.206
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.468 versus 140.845
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1291.445 versus 927.006
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8455 versus 3077
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8455 versus 3077
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 April 2017 versus 1 October 2016 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 307.2 GTexel / s versus 277.3 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 versus 2048 |
Performance á point flottant | 9,830 gflops versus 8,873 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 882 versus 672 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68096 versus 52901 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3986.188 versus 2698.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.999 versus 14.206 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.468 versus 140.845 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1291.445 versus 927.006 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8455 versus 3077 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8455 versus 3077 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P5000
- Environ 61% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 44% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1733 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 225 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- 4.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 9016 MHz versus 2000 MHz
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 12631 versus 12297
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 223.558 versus 205.048
- 7.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15489 versus 2094
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3409 versus 2391
- 7.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15489 versus 2094
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3409 versus 2391
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1733 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 225 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 9016 MHz versus 2000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12631 versus 12297 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 223.558 versus 205.048 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15489 versus 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3409 versus 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15489 versus 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3409 versus 2391 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX Vega | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12297 | 12631 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 882 | 672 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68096 | 52901 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.048 | 223.558 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3986.188 | 2698.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.999 | 14.206 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.468 | 140.845 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1291.445 | 927.006 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2094 | 15489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2391 | 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8455 | 3077 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2094 | 15489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2391 | 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8455 | 3077 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1326 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX Vega | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.3 | Pascal |
Nom de code | Greenland | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 1 April 2017 | 1 October 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $599.99 | $2,499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 242 | 245 |
Prix maintenant | $409.99 | $1,699.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 38.94 | 8.38 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 9,830 gflops | 8,873 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 4096 | 2048 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 307.2 GTexel / s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 7,200 million | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 512 GB / s | 192 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz | 9016 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |