AMD Radeon Vega 11 vs NVIDIA P106-090
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 11 and NVIDIA P106-090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 11
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 4.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 485 vs 101
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 248.838 vs 183.725
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 vs 31 July 2017 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 485 vs 101 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 248.838 vs 183.725 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-090
- 4.5x more core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 1300 MHz
- Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 73.49 GTexel / s vs 57.2 GTexel / s
- Around 9% higher pipelines: 768 vs 704
- Around 29% better floating-point performance: 2,352 gflops vs 1,830 gflops
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2343 vs 1838
- Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19027 vs 13288
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 86.225 vs 41.582
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1309.517 vs 371.843
- Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.178 vs 3.156
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.651 vs 52.449
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 1300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 73.49 GTexel / s vs 57.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 704 |
Floating-point performance | 2,352 gflops vs 1,830 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2343 vs 1838 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19027 vs 13288 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 86.225 vs 41.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1309.517 vs 371.843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.178 vs 3.156 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.651 vs 52.449 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 11
GPU 2: NVIDIA P106-090
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 11 | NVIDIA P106-090 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1838 | 2343 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 485 | 101 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13288 | 19027 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.582 | 86.225 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 371.843 | 1309.517 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.156 | 6.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.449 | 58.651 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 248.838 | 183.725 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2156 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2475 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2156 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2475 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 11 | NVIDIA P106-090 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Owl | GP106 |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 | 31 July 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 903 | 905 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1531 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1354 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,830 gflops | 2,352 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 704 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 57.2 GTexel / s | 73.49 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 4,400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 250 mm | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.6 |