AMD Radeon Vega 3 vs AMD Radeon R7 M260

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 3 and AMD Radeon R7 M260 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 3

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 980 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 889 vs 517
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 303 vs 125
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 183.156 vs 145.3
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1412 vs 1404
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2111 vs 1093
• Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3174 vs 1704
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1412 vs 1404
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2111 vs 1093
• Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3174 vs 1704

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260

• 3.1x more core clock speed: 940 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 88% higher texture fill rate: 22.56 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
• Around 88% better floating-point performance: 721.9 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
• Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5125 vs 3963
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.249 vs 10.049
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.925 vs 0.75
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.992 vs 18.933
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 77.895 vs 60.006

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 3
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M260

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	889 517
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	303 125
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3963 5125
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.049 14.249
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	183.156 145.3
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.75 0.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.933 19.992
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	60.006 77.895
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1412 1404
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2111 1093
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3174 1704
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1412 1404
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2111 1093
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3174 1704

Compare specifications (specs)