AMD Radeon Vega 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 3 and NVIDIA GeForce 210 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 3
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 12 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
- 12x more pipelines: 192 vs 16
- 9.8x better floating-point performance: 384.0 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30.5 Watt
- 7.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 889 vs 126
- 10.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 303 vs 30
- Around 63% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3963 vs 2438
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2111 vs 497
- 4.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3174 vs 688
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2111 vs 497
- 4.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3174 vs 688
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 February 2018 vs 12 October 2009 |
| Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops vs 39.36 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 30.5 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 889 vs 126 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 vs 30 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3963 vs 2438 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2111 vs 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3174 vs 688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2111 vs 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3174 vs 688 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 210
- 4.7x more core clock speed: 1402 MHz vs 300 MHz
| Core clock speed | 1402 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 3
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 210
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | NVIDIA GeForce 210 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 889 | 126 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 | 30 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3963 | 2438 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.049 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 183.156 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.75 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.933 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.006 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1412 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2111 | 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3174 | 688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1412 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2111 | 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3174 | 688 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 418 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Vega 3 | NVIDIA GeForce 210 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Owl | GT218 |
| Launch date | 13 February 2018 | 12 October 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 1267 | 1674 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $29.49 | |
| Price now | $32.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 6.81 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1402 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops | 39.36 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s | 4.16 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30.5 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,940 million | 260 million |
| CUDA cores | 16 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA, DVIVGADisplayPort |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 2.731" (6.9 cm) | |
| Length | 6.60" (16.8 cm) | |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 8.0 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.1 | |
| OpenGL | 3.1 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Vega 3 with others
AMDRadeon Vega 3 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder Radeon 8500DV
AMDRadeon Vega 3 vs
ATIRadeon 9200 SE
AMDRadeon Vega 3 vs
ATIRadeon 9200 LE
AMDRadeon Vega 3 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740
AMDRadeon Vega 3 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260DX
AMDRadeon Vega 3 vs
AMDRadeon R8 M365DX
