ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO

Comparative analysis of ATI FirePro V3800 and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V3800

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• 4.2x more pipelines: 400 vs 96
• Around 97% better floating-point performance: 520.0 gflops vs 264 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 43 Watt vs 105 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 384 MB
• 2.3x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz
• Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 179 vs 97
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2958 vs 2160
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2958 vs 2160

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO

• 2.1x more core clock speed: 1375 MHz vs 650 MHz
• 2x more texture fill rate: 26.4 billion / sec vs 13 GTexel / s
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 328 vs 321

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: ATI FirePro V3800
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	321 328
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	179 97
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2958 2160
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2958 2160

Compare specifications (specs)