ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Comparative analysis of ATI FirePro V3800 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V3800
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 625 MHz
- Around 30% higher texture fill rate: 13 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
- 12.5x more pipelines: 400 vs 32
- 6.5x better floating-point performance: 520.0 gflops vs 80 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 16% lower typical power consumption: 43 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 321 vs 231
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 179 vs 89
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 April 2010 vs 1 June 2007 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 13 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 400 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 520.0 gflops vs 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 43 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 321 vs 231 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 179 vs 89 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI FirePro V3800
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | ATI FirePro V3800 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 321 | 231 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 179 | 89 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.432 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 153.019 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.29 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.314 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 48.552 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1572 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2958 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1572 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2958 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI FirePro V3800 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
Code name | Redwood | G84 |
Launch date | 26 April 2010 | 1 June 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $129 | $149.90 |
Place in performance rating | 1411 | 1414 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Price now | $149.90 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.87 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 625 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 520.0 gflops | 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 400 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 13 GTexel / s | 10 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 43 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 627 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-HE |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |