ATI Radeon HD 5670 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5670 and NVIDIA GeForce 210 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5670
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- 3.7x more texture fill rate: 15.5 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
- 25x more pipelines: 400 vs 16
- 15.8x better floating-point performance: 620.0 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 8x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 6.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 801 vs 126
- 9.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 291 vs 30
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1129 vs 497
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2113 vs 688
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1129 vs 497
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2113 vs 688
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 14 January 2010 vs 12 October 2009 |
| Texture fill rate | 15.5 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 400 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 620.0 gflops vs 39.36 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 801 vs 126 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 291 vs 30 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1129 vs 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2113 vs 688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1129 vs 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2113 vs 688 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Around 81% higher core clock speed: 1402 MHz vs 775 MHz
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 30.5 Watt vs 64 Watt
- 3.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2438 vs 693
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1402 MHz vs 775 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30.5 Watt vs 64 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2438 vs 693 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5670
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 210
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | ATI Radeon HD 5670 | NVIDIA GeForce 210 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 801 | 126 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 291 | 30 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 693 | 2438 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.914 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 184.557 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.319 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.627 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.325 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1462 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1129 | 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2113 | 688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1462 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1129 | 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2113 | 688 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI Radeon HD 5670 | NVIDIA GeForce 210 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Redwood | GT218 |
| Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
| Launch date | 14 January 2010 | 12 October 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $119 | $29.49 |
| Place in performance rating | 1427 | 1674 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $32.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 6.81 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 775 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 1402 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 620.0 gflops | 39.36 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 400 | 16 |
| Stream Processors | 400 | |
| Texture fill rate | 15.5 GTexel / s | 4.16 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | 30.5 Watt |
| Transistor count | 627 million | 260 million |
| CUDA cores | 16 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA, DVIVGADisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | 6.60" (16.8 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 2.731" (6.9 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 8.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR2 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare ATI Radeon HD 5670 with others
ATIRadeon HD 5670 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600 GSO
ATIRadeon HD 5670 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1800
ATIRadeon HD 5670 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 230
ATIRadeon HD 5670 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6570
ATIRadeon HD 5670 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6520G
ATIRadeon HD 5670 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 555M
