Apple M1 7-core vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Comparative analysis of Apple M1 7-core and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Apple M1 7-core
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1278 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 28 nm
- 17.9x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3723 vs 3695
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3723 vs 3695
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3364 vs 3338
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3364 vs 3338
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 Nov 2020 vs 2 June 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1278 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 vs 3338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 vs 3338 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- 402.3x more pipelines: 2816 vs 7
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42988 vs 18993
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2816 vs 7 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42988 vs 18993 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10471 vs 10433 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10471 vs 10433 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Apple M1 7-core
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Apple M1 7-core | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18993 | 42988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10433 | 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10433 | 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 | 3338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 | 3338 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13758 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 852 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 145.843 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1722.98 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.661 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.16 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 788.464 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1321 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Apple M1 7-core | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Launch date | 10 Nov 2020 | 2 June 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 419 | 310 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | |
Code name | GM200 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Price now | $679.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 23.43 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1278 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 590 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4750 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.290 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 7 | 2816 |
Render output units | 28 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | 250 Watt |
Boost clock speed | 1075 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 2816 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,060 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 176 billion / sec | |
Transistor count | 8,000 million | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 66.67 GB/s | 336.5 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
SLI options | 4x | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin + 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.5 |