Intel HD Graphics 4000 vs AMD Radeon HD 6470M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4000 and AMD Radeon HD 6470M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 347 vs 226
• Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 vs 105
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.712 vs 2.282
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 155.638 vs 112.819
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.931 vs 0.276
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 7.36 vs 5.671
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 754 vs 589
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1492 vs 1251
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 vs 1881
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 754 vs 589
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1492 vs 1251
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 1881

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6470M

• Around 8% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 650 MHz
• Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 5.6 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
• 10x more pipelines: 160 vs 16
• 6.7x better floating-point performance: 224 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
• Around 36% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 729 vs 538
• Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.025 vs 12.009

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6470M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	347 226
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	194 105
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	538 729
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.712 2.282
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	155.638 112.819
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.931 0.276
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.36 5.671
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.009 23.025
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	754 589
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1492 1251
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2392 1881
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	754 589
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1492 1251
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2392 1881

Compare specifications (specs)