Intel HD Graphics 4000 vs AMD Radeon HD 6630M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4000 and AMD Radeon HD 6630M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 30% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 500 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.712 vs 2.847
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 155.638 vs 142.549
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 754 vs 424
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1492 vs 1055
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 vs 2368
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 754 vs 424
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1492 vs 1055
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 2368

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6630M

• 2.9x more texture fill rate: 12 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
• 30x more pipelines: 480 vs 16
• 14.3x better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
• Around 73% lower typical power consumption: 26 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 685 vs 347
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 390 vs 194
• Around 83% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 984 vs 538
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.527 vs 7.36
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.818 vs 12.009

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6630M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	347 685
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	194 390
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	538 984
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.712 2.847
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	155.638 142.549
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.36 9.527
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.009 42.818
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	754 424
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1492 1055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2392 2368
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	754 424
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1492 1055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2392 2368

Compare specifications (specs)