Intel HD Graphics 4000 vs Intel HD Graphics 2500
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4000 and Intel HD Graphics 2500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 3.7x more texture fill rate: 4.2 GTexel / s vs 1.15 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 16 vs 6
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 33.6 gflops vs 13.8 gflops
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 538 vs 249
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 May 2012 vs 1 April 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 4.2 GTexel / s vs 1.15 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 16 vs 6 |
Floating-point performance | 33.6 gflops vs 13.8 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 538 vs 249 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 2500
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4000
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 2500
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | Intel HD Graphics 2500 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 347 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 538 | 249 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.712 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 155.638 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.931 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.36 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.009 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 754 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1492 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 754 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1492 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 4000 | Intel HD Graphics 2500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.0 | Generation 7.0 |
Code name | Ivy Bridge GT2 | Ivy Bridge GT1 |
Launch date | 14 May 2012 | 1 April 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1501 | 1710 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 33.6 gflops | 13.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 6 |
Texture fill rate | 4.2 GTexel / s | 1.15 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,200 million | 392 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.1 (11_0) | 11.1 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.0 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |