Intel HD Graphics 4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4000 and NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 14% better floating-point performance: 33.6 gflops vs 29.376 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 347 vs 169
- 5.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 vs 38
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 vs 1016
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 1016
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 14 May 2012 vs 1 August 2008 |
| Floating-point performance | 33.6 gflops vs 29.376 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 80 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 347 vs 169 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 vs 38 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 vs 1016 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 vs 1016 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 4.4 billion / sec vs 4.2 GTexel / s
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1796 vs 1492
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1796 vs 1492
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 4.4 billion / sec vs 4.2 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1796 vs 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1796 vs 1492 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 347 | 169 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 | 38 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 538 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.712 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 155.638 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.931 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.36 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.009 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 754 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1492 | 1796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 | 1016 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 754 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1492 | 1796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 | 1016 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 4000 | NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | Ivy Bridge GT2 | G86 |
| Launch date | 14 May 2012 | 1 August 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1501 | 1460 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $79.99 | |
| Price now | $79.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 3.05 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 33.6 gflops | 29.376 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 16 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 4.2 GTexel / s | 4.4 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,200 million | 210 million |
| CUDA cores | 16 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 6.6" (16.8 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.1 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.0 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 400 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR2 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 4000 with others
IntelHD Graphics 4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 550M
IntelHD Graphics 4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 540M
IntelHD Graphics 4000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 3000M
IntelHD Graphics 4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M
IntelHD Graphics 4000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7480D
IntelHD Graphics 4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
