Intel HD Graphics 4400 vs Intel HD Graphics 4600

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4400 and Intel HD Graphics 4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3044 vs 2808
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3044 vs 2808

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600

• Around 14% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1150 MHz
• Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 5 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
• Around 9% better floating-point performance: 50 gflops vs 46 gflops
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 630 vs 524
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 vs 275
• Around 50% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3210 vs 2143
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.844 vs 7.844
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 171.17 vs 154.696
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.115 vs 0.958
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.385 vs 9.084
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 12.361 vs 8.335
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 988 vs 817
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1702 vs 1381
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 988 vs 817
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1702 vs 1381
• Around 28% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 194 vs 152

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4400
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	524 630
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	275 314
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2143 3210
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.844 8.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	154.696 171.17
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.958 1.115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.084 10.385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.335 12.361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	817 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1381 1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3044 2808
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	817 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1381 1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3044 2808
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	152 194

Compare specifications (specs)