Intel HD Graphics 4400 vs NVIDIA GeForce 610M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4400 and NVIDIA GeForce 610M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 900 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 524 vs 292
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 275 vs 113
• Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2143 vs 1396
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.844 vs 2.747
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 154.696 vs 104.498
• 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.958 vs 0.27
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.084 vs 5.832
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 817 vs 664
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3044 vs 2848
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 817 vs 664
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3044 vs 2848

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 610M

• Around 92% higher core clock speed: 672 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 2.4x more pipelines: 48 vs 20
• 2.8x better floating-point performance: 129.02 gflops vs 46 gflops
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 20 Watt
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 9.69 vs 8.335
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1602 vs 1381
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1602 vs 1381

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 610M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	524 292
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	275 113
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2143 1396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.844 2.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	154.696 104.498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.958 0.27
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.084 5.832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.335 9.69
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	817 664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1381 1602
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3044 2848
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	817 664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1381 1602
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3044 2848

Compare specifications (specs)