Intel HD Graphics 4400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4400 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 275 vs 237
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.844 vs 6.139
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.958 vs 0.65
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 September 2013 vs 1 February 2011 |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 275 vs 237 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.844 vs 6.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.958 vs 0.65 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
- 4.6x more core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 13.0 billion / sec vs 4.6 GTexel / s
- 4.8x more pipelines: 96 vs 20
- 6.8x better floating-point performance: 311.04 gflops vs 46 gflops
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 774 vs 524
- Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2626 vs 2143
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 171.053 vs 154.696
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.729 vs 9.084
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.871 vs 8.335
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1208 vs 817
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2053 vs 1381
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3275 vs 3044
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1208 vs 817
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2053 vs 1381
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3275 vs 3044
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 13.0 billion / sec vs 4.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 96 vs 20 |
Floating-point performance | 311.04 gflops vs 46 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 774 vs 524 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2626 vs 2143 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.053 vs 154.696 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.729 vs 9.084 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.871 vs 8.335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1208 vs 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2053 vs 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3275 vs 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1208 vs 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2053 vs 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3275 vs 3044 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 4400 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 524 | 774 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 275 | 237 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2143 | 2626 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.844 | 6.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 154.696 | 171.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.958 | 0.65 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.084 | 9.729 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.335 | 19.871 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 817 | 1208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1381 | 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3044 | 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 817 | 1208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1381 | 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3044 | 3275 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 152 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 4400 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Fermi |
Code name | Haswell GT2 | GF108 |
Launch date | 3 September 2013 | 1 February 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1421 | 1342 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
Price now | $69.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.03 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 46 gflops | 311.04 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 20 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 4.6 GTexel / s | 13.0 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 392 million | 585 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGADual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 (DDR3) – 51.2 (GDDR5) | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA |