Intel HD Graphics 4400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
• 8.5x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 170 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

• 2.4x more core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 11.5x more texture fill rate: 52.7 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
• 19.2x more pipelines: 384 vs 20
• 27.5x better floating-point performance: 1,263.4 gflops vs 46 gflops
• 5.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3063 vs 524
• Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 438 vs 275
• 5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10721 vs 2143
• 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.935 vs 7.844
• 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 539.966 vs 154.696
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.344 vs 0.958
• 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.841 vs 9.084
• 7.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 64.308 vs 8.335
• 5.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4184 vs 817
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 1381
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 3044
• 5.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4184 vs 817
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 1381
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 3044
• 2.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 389 vs 152

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	524 3063
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	275 438
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2143 10721
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.844 31.935
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	154.696 539.966
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.958 2.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.084 35.841
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.335 64.308
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	817 4184
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1381 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3044 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	817 4184
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1381 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3044 3333
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	152 389

Compare specifications (specs)