Intel HD Graphics 4400 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 4400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel HD Graphics 4400

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4400

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 7 mois plus tard
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 40 nm
8.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 20 Watt versus 170 Watt

Date de sortie	3 September 2013 versus 25 January 2011
Processus de fabrication	22 nm versus 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	20 Watt versus 170 Watt

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

2.4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 823 MHz versus 350 MHz
times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 52.7 GTexel / s versus 4.6 GTexel / s
19.2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 20
27.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,263.4 gflops versus 46 gflops
5.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3063 versus 524
Environ 59% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 438 versus 275
5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 10721 versus 2143
4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.935 versus 7.844
3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 539.966 versus 154.696
2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.344 versus 0.958
3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.841 versus 9.084
7.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 64.308 versus 8.335
5.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4184 versus 817
2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 versus 1381
Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 versus 3044
5.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4184 versus 817
2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 versus 1381
Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 versus 3044
2.6x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 389 versus 152

Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau	823 MHz versus 350 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	52.7 GTexel / s versus 4.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 versus 20
Performance á point flottant	1,263.4 gflops versus 46 gflops
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	3063 versus 524
PassMark - G2D Mark	438 versus 275
Geekbench - OpenCL	10721 versus 2143
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	31.935 versus 7.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	539.966 versus 154.696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.344 versus 0.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	35.841 versus 9.084
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	64.308 versus 8.335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4184 versus 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3683 versus 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3333 versus 3044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4184 versus 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3683 versus 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3333 versus 3044
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	389 versus 152

Comparer les références

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

524

3063

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

275

438

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

2143

10721

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7.844

31.935

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

154.696

539.966

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.958

2.344

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9.084

35.841

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8.335

64.308

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

817

4184

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1381

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3044

3333

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

817

4184

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1381

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3044

3333

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

152

389

Nom	Intel HD Graphics 4400	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark	524	3063
PassMark - G2D Mark	275	438
Geekbench - OpenCL	2143	10721
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	7.844	31.935
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	154.696	539.966
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.958	2.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	9.084	35.841
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	8.335	64.308
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	817	4184
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1381	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3044	3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	817	4184
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1381	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3044	3333
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	152	389

Comparer les caractéristiques

	Intel HD Graphics 4400	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Essentiel
Architecture	Generation 7.5	Fermi 2.0
Nom de code	Haswell GT2	GF114
Date de sortie	3 September 2013	25 January 2011
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1421	799
Genre	Laptop	Desktop
Prix de sortie (MSRP)		$249
Prix maintenant		$138
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)		27.88
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1150 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	350 MHz	823 MHz
Performance á point flottant	46 gflops	1,263.4 gflops
Processus de fabrication	22 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	20	384
Taux de remplissage de la texture	4.6 GTexel / s	52.7 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	20 Watt	170 Watt
Compte de transistor	392 million	1,950 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Longeur		229 mm
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires		2x 6-pin
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.3	4.6
Mémoire
Largeur du bus mémoire	64 / 128 Bit	256 Bit
Mémoire partagé	1
RAM maximale		1 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire		128.3 GB / s
Vitesse de mémoire		4008 MHz
Genre de mémoire		GDDR5
Technologies
Quick Sync