Intel HD Graphics 505 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 505 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 505
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 14.4 GTexel / s vs 12.75 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 90% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 19 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB or 1 GB
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1635 vs 519
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1635 vs 519
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 956 vs 280
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 956 vs 280
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 29 September 2014 |
Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s vs 12.75 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 19 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB or 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1635 vs 519 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1635 vs 519 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 956 vs 280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 956 vs 280 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
- 3.2x more core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 250 MHz
- 10.7x more pipelines: 192 vs 18
- Around 33% better floating-point performance: 306.0 gflops vs 230.4 gflops
- Around 65% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2279 vs 1385
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 199 vs 95
- Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 611 vs 354
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 895 vs 470
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 895 vs 470
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 797 MHz vs 250 MHz |
Pipelines | 192 vs 18 |
Floating-point performance | 306.0 gflops vs 230.4 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2279 vs 1385 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 199 vs 95 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 611 vs 354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 895 vs 470 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 895 vs 470 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 505
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 505 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1385 | 2279 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 95 | 199 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 354 | 611 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1635 | 519 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1635 | 519 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 956 | 280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 956 | 280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 470 | 895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 470 | 895 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.418 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 142.734 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.395 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.158 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.317 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 505 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | Apollo Lake GT1 | GK208B |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 29 September 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1528 | 1588 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $49 | |
Price now | $54.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.44 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 250 MHz | 797 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 230.4 gflops | 306.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 18 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s | 12.75 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 19 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB or 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | DDR3 / GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 (DDR3) or 40 (GDDR5) | |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA |