Intel HD Graphics 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GS
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 510 and NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 510
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.9x more core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 103 MHz
- Around 66% higher texture fill rate: 11.4 GTexel / s vs 6.88 GTexel / s
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 182.4 gflops vs 68.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 20 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
- 5.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 625 vs 118
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 163 vs 60
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 3 June 2008 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz vs 103 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 11.4 GTexel / s vs 6.88 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 182.4 gflops vs 68.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 20 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 625 vs 118 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 163 vs 60 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GS
- 2.7x more pipelines: 32 vs 12
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1798 vs 1786
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1798 vs 1786
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 32 vs 12 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1798 vs 1786 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1798 vs 1786 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 510
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GS
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 510 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GS |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 625 | 118 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 163 | 60 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2471 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.381 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.873 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.081 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.675 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.094 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 902 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1333 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1786 | 1798 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 902 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1333 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1786 | 1798 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 510 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Skylake GT1 | G96 |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 3 June 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1496 | 1538 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 103 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 182.4 gflops | 68.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 12 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 11.4 GTexel / s | 6.88 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 314 million |
CUDA cores | 32 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-II |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |