Intel HD Graphics 520 vs Intel HD Graphics 530
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 520 and Intel HD Graphics 530 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 32 GB
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 995 vs 864
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 254 vs 209
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4397 vs 3993
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.747 vs 21.852
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 330.464 vs 143.083
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.804 vs 1.243
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.781 vs 12.958
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 30.177 vs 28.182
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1045 vs 951
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2393 vs 1462
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1045 vs 951
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2393 vs 1462
- Around 18% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 384 vs 326
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 32 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 vs 864 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 vs 209 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4397 vs 3993 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 vs 21.852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 vs 143.083 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 vs 1.243 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 vs 12.958 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.177 vs 28.182 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1045 vs 951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 vs 1462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1045 vs 951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 vs 1462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3337 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 384 vs 326 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 530
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 520 | Intel HD Graphics 530 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 864 | 995 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | 254 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3993 | 4397 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 | 30.747 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 | 330.464 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 | 1.804 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 | 19.781 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 | 30.177 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 | 1045 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 | 2393 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 | 1045 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 | 2393 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 | 384 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 520 | Intel HD Graphics 530 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Generation 9.0 |
Code name | Skylake GT2 | Skylake GT2 |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 1 September 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1381 | 1248 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 24 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 189 million |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 64 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 |
Shared memory | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |