Intel HD Graphics 520 versus Intel HD Graphics 530
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 520 and Intel HD Graphics 530 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 530
- Environ 17% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 350 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1150 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 32 GB
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 995 versus 864
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 254 versus 209
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4397 versus 3993
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.747 versus 21.852
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 330.464 versus 143.083
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.804 versus 1.243
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.781 versus 12.958
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 30.177 versus 28.182
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1045 versus 951
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2393 versus 1462
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1045 versus 951
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2393 versus 1462
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 384 versus 326
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 32 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 versus 864 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 versus 209 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4397 versus 3993 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 versus 21.852 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 versus 143.083 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 versus 1.243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 versus 12.958 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.177 versus 28.182 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1045 versus 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 versus 1462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 versus 3337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1045 versus 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 versus 1462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 versus 3337 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 384 versus 326 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 530
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 520 | Intel HD Graphics 530 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 864 | 995 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | 254 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3993 | 4397 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 | 30.747 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 | 330.464 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 | 1.804 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 | 19.781 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 | 30.177 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 | 1045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 | 2393 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 | 1045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 | 2393 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 3346 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 | 384 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 520 | Intel HD Graphics 530 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Generation 9.0 |
| Nom de code | Skylake GT2 | Skylake GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 | 1 September 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1381 | 1248 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 24 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 189 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 403.2 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.2 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 520 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
IntelHD Graphics
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 620
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
