Intel HD Graphics 520 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 520 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 7.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 116 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.852 vs 18.461
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.243 vs 1.125
- Around 1% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 326 vs 322
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 15 March 2011 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 116 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 vs 18.461 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 vs 1.125 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 vs 3322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 vs 3322 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 vs 322 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
- 6x more core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 192 vs 24
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1557 vs 864
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 382 vs 209
- Around 44% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5750 vs 3993
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.392 vs 143.083
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.511 vs 12.958
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 41.941 vs 28.182
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2488 vs 951
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3351 vs 1462
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2488 vs 951
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3351 vs 1462
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1557 vs 864 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 382 vs 209 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5750 vs 3993 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.392 vs 143.083 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.511 vs 12.958 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 41.941 vs 28.182 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2488 vs 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3351 vs 1462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2488 vs 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3351 vs 1462 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 864 | 1557 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | 382 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3993 | 5750 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 | 18.461 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 | 354.392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 | 1.125 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 | 18.511 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 | 41.941 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 | 2488 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 3322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 | 2488 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 3322 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 | 322 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Skylake GT2 | GF116 |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 15 March 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1381 | 1019 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Price now | $287.59 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.49 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 192 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 116 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,170 million |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 100 °C | |
| Texture fill rate | 28.8 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 8.25" (21 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 98.4 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1026 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||

