Intel HD Graphics 520 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 520 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 520
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 7.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 116 Watt
- 32x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.852 versus 18.461
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.243 versus 1.125
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 326 versus 322
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 versus 15 March 2011 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 116 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 versus 18.461 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 versus 1.125 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 versus 3322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 versus 3322 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 versus 322 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
- 6x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1800 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 8x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 24
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1557 versus 864
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 382 versus 209
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5750 versus 3993
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.392 versus 143.083
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.511 versus 12.958
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 41.941 versus 28.182
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2488 versus 951
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3351 versus 1462
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2488 versus 951
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3351 versus 1462
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1800 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 192 versus 24 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1557 versus 864 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 382 versus 209 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5750 versus 3993 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.392 versus 143.083 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.511 versus 12.958 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 41.941 versus 28.182 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2488 versus 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3351 versus 1462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2488 versus 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3351 versus 1462 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 864 | 1557 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | 382 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3993 | 5750 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 | 18.461 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 | 354.392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 | 1.125 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 | 18.511 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 | 41.941 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 | 2488 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 3322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 | 2488 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 3322 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 | 322 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Skylake GT2 | GF116 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 | 15 March 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1381 | 1019 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Prix maintenant | $287.59 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 7.49 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 192 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 116 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,170 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 691.2 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 100 °C | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 8.25" (21 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 2-way | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | 1 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 98.4 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1026 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 520 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
IntelHD Graphics
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 620
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
