Intel HD Graphics 520 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 520 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 55 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 18 February 2014 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 55 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 1 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 21.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 24
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3337 vs 864
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 515 vs 209
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9306 vs 3993
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.239 vs 21.852
- 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 639.427 vs 143.083
- Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.341 vs 1.243
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32 vs 12.958
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 69.814 vs 28.182
- 4.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4498 vs 951
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 vs 1462
- 4.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4498 vs 951
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 vs 1462
- 3.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1050 vs 326
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3337 vs 864 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 vs 209 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9306 vs 3993 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 vs 21.852 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.427 vs 143.083 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.341 vs 1.243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 vs 12.958 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.814 vs 28.182 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 vs 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 vs 1462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 vs 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 vs 1462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3337 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1050 vs 326 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 864 | 3337 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | 515 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3993 | 9306 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 | 34.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 | 639.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 | 2.341 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 | 32 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 | 69.814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 | 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 | 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 3346 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 | 1050 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Skylake GT2 | GM107 |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 18 February 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1381 | 724 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $119 | |
| Price now | $150.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 27.54 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 512 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,870 million |
| CUDA cores | 512 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,111 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
| Texture fill rate | 34.72 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 5.0 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 520 with others
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
IntelHD Graphics
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 620
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
