Intel HD Graphics 530 vs AMD FirePro W4100

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 530 and AMD FirePro W4100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 20.16 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
• 32x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.747 vs 15.65
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.804 vs 1.631
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 1620
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 1620

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4100

• Around 80% higher core clock speed: 630 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 21.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 24
• Around 60% better floating-point performance: 645.1 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
• Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1504 vs 995
• Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 453 vs 254
• Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5447 vs 4397
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 538.848 vs 330.464
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.533 vs 19.781
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 75.309 vs 30.177
• Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1951 vs 1045
• Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3399 vs 2393
• Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1951 vs 1045
• Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3399 vs 2393

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	995 1504
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	254 453
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4397 5447
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.747 15.65
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	330.464 538.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.804 1.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.781 31.533
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.177 75.309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1045 1951
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2393 3399
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 1620
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1045 1951
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2393 3399
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 1620

Compare specifications (specs)