Intel HD Graphics 530 vs AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 530 and AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 64x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2393 vs 1841
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3260
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2393 vs 1841
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3260
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 vs 1841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 vs 1841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3260 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- 2x better floating-point performance: 806.4 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
- Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5150 vs 4397
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1106 vs 1045
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1106 vs 1045
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
| Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops vs 403.2 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5150 vs 4397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1106 vs 1045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1106 vs 1045 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 530 | AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4397 | 5150 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.177 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1045 | 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 | 1841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1045 | 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 | 1841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3260 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 384 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 530 | AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Skylake GT2 | Oland |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1248 | 1281 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | 806.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 530 with others
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
ATIRadeon 9800 SE
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 4000
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000M
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAGRID K180Q
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
AMDRadeon 620
