Intel HD Graphics 530 vs Intel HD Graphics 4600

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 530 and Intel HD Graphics 4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 5x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 24 vs 20
• 8.1x better floating-point performance: 403.2 gflops vs 50 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 995 vs 630
• Around 37% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4397 vs 3210
• 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.747 vs 8.844
• Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 330.464 vs 171.17
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.804 vs 1.115
• Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.781 vs 10.385
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 30.177 vs 12.361
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1045 vs 988
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2393 vs 1702
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 2808
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1045 vs 988
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2393 vs 1702
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 2808
• Around 98% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 384 vs 194

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600

• Around 14% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1150 MHz
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 vs 254

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	995 630
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	254 314
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4397 3210
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.747 8.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	330.464 171.17
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.804 1.115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.781 10.385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.177 12.361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1045 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2393 1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 2808
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1045 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2393 1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 2808
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	384 194

Compare specifications (specs)