Intel HD Graphics 530 versus Intel HD Graphics 4600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 530 and Intel HD Graphics 4600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 530
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 25.2 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 24 versus 20
- 8.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 403.2 gflops versus 50 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 22 nm
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 45 Watt
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 995 versus 630
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4397 versus 3210
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.747 versus 8.844
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 330.464 versus 171.17
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.804 versus 1.115
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.781 versus 10.385
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 30.177 versus 12.361
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1045 versus 988
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2393 versus 1702
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 versus 2808
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1045 versus 988
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2393 versus 1702
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 versus 2808
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 384 versus 194
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 versus 3 June 2013 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.2 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 24 versus 20 |
| Performance á point flottant | 403.2 gflops versus 50 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 22 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 45 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 versus 630 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4397 versus 3210 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 versus 8.844 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 versus 171.17 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 versus 1.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 versus 10.385 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.177 versus 12.361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1045 versus 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 versus 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 versus 2808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1045 versus 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 versus 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 versus 2808 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 384 versus 194 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Environ 14% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 400 MHz versus 350 MHz
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1250 MHz versus 1150 MHz
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 versus 254
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 400 MHz versus 350 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz versus 1150 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 versus 254 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 530 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 | 630 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 | 314 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4397 | 3210 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 | 8.844 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 | 171.17 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 | 1.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 | 10.385 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.177 | 12.361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1045 | 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 | 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 2808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1045 | 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 | 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 2808 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 384 | 194 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 530 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Generation 7.5 |
| Nom de code | Skylake GT2 | Haswell GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 | 3 June 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1248 | 1359 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 403.2 gflops | 50 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 20 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.2 GTexel / s | 5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 392 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 64 GB | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 530 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
ATIRadeon 9800 SE
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 4000
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000M
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAGRID K180Q
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
AMDRadeon 620
