Intel HD Graphics 530 vs NVIDIA GeForce 920M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 530 and NVIDIA GeForce 920M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• 2x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
• Around 35% better floating-point performance: 403.2 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
• 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 995 vs 716
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 254 vs 119
• Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4397 vs 3722
• 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.747 vs 8.358
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 330.464 vs 157.606
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.804 vs 0.843
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.781 vs 15.374
• Around 18% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 384 vs 326

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920M

• 2.7x more core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 40.443 vs 30.177
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1598 vs 1045
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3636 vs 2393
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1598 vs 1045
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3636 vs 2393

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 920M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	995 716
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	254 119
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4397 3722
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.747 8.358
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	330.464 157.606
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.804 0.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.781 15.374
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.177 40.443
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1045 1598
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2393 3636
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1045 1598
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2393 3636
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	384 326

Compare specifications (specs)