Intel HD Graphics 530 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 530 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 120 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 384 vs 162
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 22 January 2015 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3335 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 384 vs 162 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
- 3.2x more core clock speed: 1127 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1178 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 72 billion / sec vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- 42.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 24
- 6x better floating-point performance: 2,413 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
- 6.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6111 vs 995
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 vs 254
- 4.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18734 vs 4397
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 73.733 vs 30.747
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 792.44 vs 330.464
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.888 vs 1.804
- Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.338 vs 19.781
- 6.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 200.825 vs 30.177
- 6.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7218 vs 1045
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 vs 2393
- 6.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7218 vs 1045
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 vs 2393
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1127 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1178 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 72 billion / sec vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 24 |
Floating-point performance | 2,413 gflops vs 403.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6111 vs 995 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 vs 254 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18734 vs 4397 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 73.733 vs 30.747 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 792.44 vs 330.464 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.888 vs 1.804 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.338 vs 19.781 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 200.825 vs 30.177 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7218 vs 1045 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 vs 2393 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7218 vs 1045 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 vs 2393 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 530 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 | 6111 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 | 673 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4397 | 18734 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 | 73.733 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 | 792.44 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 | 4.888 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 | 35.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.177 | 200.825 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1045 | 7218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1045 | 7218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3335 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 384 | 162 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 530 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Skylake GT2 | GM206 |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 22 January 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1248 | 514 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Price now | $229.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 34.63 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 1127 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | 2,413 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 1024 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 72 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 2,940 million |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
SLI options | 2x | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pins | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost |