Intel HD Graphics 530 vs NVIDIA Quadro K600

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 530 and NVIDIA Quadro K600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 80% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 14.02 GTexel / s
• Around 20% better floating-point performance: 403.2 gflops vs 336.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 41 Watt
• 64x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 995 vs 728
• 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4397 vs 1830
• 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.747 vs 6.367
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 330.464 vs 118.389
• 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.804 vs 0.396
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.781 vs 7.921
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 30.177 vs 9.393
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2393 vs 1745
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 2261
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2393 vs 1745
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 2261

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K600

• 2.5x more core clock speed: 876 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 8x more pipelines: 192 vs 24
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 278 vs 254
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1227 vs 1045
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1227 vs 1045

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	995 728
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	254 278
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4397 1830
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.747 6.367
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	330.464 118.389
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.804 0.396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.781 7.921
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.177 9.393
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1045 1227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2393 1745
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 2261
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1045 1227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2393 1745
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 2261

Compare specifications (specs)