Intel HD Graphics 5300 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 5300 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 5300
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 50 Watt
- 16.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 709 versus 42
- 12.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 693 versus 55
- 22.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1627 versus 72.2
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 September 2014 versus 8 November 2013 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 709 versus 42 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 693 versus 55 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1627 versus 72.2 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
- 9.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 926 MHz versus 100 MHz
- 16x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 24
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2483 versus 709
- 4.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3406 versus 693
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4045 versus 1627
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 926 MHz versus 100 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 24 |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2483 versus 709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3406 versus 693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4045 versus 1627 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5300
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 5300 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 400 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 181 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1468 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 709 | 2483 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 709 | 42 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 693 | 3406 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 693 | 55 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1627 | 4045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1627 | 72.2 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.451 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 370.814 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.075 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.902 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.557 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 5300 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Broadwell GT2 | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 5 September 2014 | 8 November 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1458 | 1459 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 900 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 100 MHz | 926 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,300 million | 1,270 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 711.2 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.63 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.26 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5016 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 5300 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 5300 vs
ATIMobility FireGL 7800
IntelHD Graphics 5300 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 410
IntelHD Graphics 5300 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 735M
IntelHD Graphics 5300 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
IntelHD Graphics 5300 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 11 Mobile
IntelHD Graphics 5300 vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake)
