Intel HD Graphics 610 vs ATI Radeon HD 5450
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 610 and ATI Radeon HD 5450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 610
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 69% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 5.1x more texture fill rate: 26.4 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- 4.1x better floating-point performance: 422.4 gflops vs 104 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 19 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
- 5.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 693 vs 136
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 155 vs 140
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1017 vs 344
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1017 vs 344
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 vs 4 February 2010 |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 26.4 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops vs 104 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 19 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 693 vs 136 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 155 vs 140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1017 vs 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1017 vs 344 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5450
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 6.7x more pipelines: 80 vs 12
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2572 vs 2443
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 666 vs 464
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1457 vs 845
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 666 vs 464
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1457 vs 845
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 80 vs 12 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2572 vs 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 666 vs 464 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1457 vs 845 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 666 vs 464 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1457 vs 845 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 610
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 610 | ATI Radeon HD 5450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 693 | 136 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 155 | 140 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2443 | 2572 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1017 | 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 464 | 666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 845 | 1457 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1017 | 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 464 | 666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 845 | 1457 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.16 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.124 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 610 | ATI Radeon HD 5450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT1 | Cedar |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 | 4 February 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1531 | 1606 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 650 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops | 104 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 12 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 26.4 GTexel / s | 5.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 19 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 170 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR2 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
AMD Eyefinity |