Intel HD Graphics 615 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 615 and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 615
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.7x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 9.2 GTexel / s
- 5.5x better floating-point performance: 403.2 gflops vs 73.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 80 nm
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 20 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 708 vs 208
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 186 vs 84
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2409 vs 1857
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2409 vs 1857
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 vs 9 June 2007 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 9.2 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops vs 73.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 20 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 708 vs 208 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 186 vs 84 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2409 vs 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2409 vs 1857 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
- Around 92% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 32 vs 24
Core clock speed | 575 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 32 vs 24 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 615
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 615 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 708 | 208 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 186 | 84 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3041 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.486 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.572 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.238 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.311 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.292 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1128 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1128 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2409 | 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1128 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1128 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2409 | 1857 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 615 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Tesla |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | G84 |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 | 9 June 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1483 | 1480 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | 73.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 9.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-HE |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 | GDDR3, GDDR2 |
Shared memory | 1 | no |
Memory bandwidth | 22.4 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
Gigathread technology | ||
HDCP-capable | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 |