Intel HD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 620
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- 8x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 120 Watt
- 5.3x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 6 GB
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 6 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
- 5x more core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 63% higher boost clock speed: 1708 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 5.3x more texture fill rate: 133.6 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- 53.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 24
- 10.6x better floating-point performance: 4,275 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
- 8.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8160 vs 922
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 216
- 7.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 31098 vs 4178
- 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.55 vs 24.275
- 6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1371.266 vs 227.879
- 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.49 vs 1.508
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.803 vs 15.582
- 16.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 509.222 vs 30.288
- 9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12645 vs 1404
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3654 vs 1733
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3340
- 9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12645 vs 1404
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3654 vs 1733
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3340
- 10.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3677 vs 343
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 133.6 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 24 |
Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops vs 403.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8160 vs 922 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 vs 216 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 31098 vs 4178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.55 vs 24.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1371.266 vs 227.879 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.49 vs 1.508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.803 vs 15.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 509.222 vs 30.288 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 vs 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3654 vs 1733 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 vs 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3654 vs 1733 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3677 vs 343 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 922 | 8160 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 216 | 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4178 | 31098 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.275 | 111.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 227.879 | 1371.266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.508 | 8.49 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.582 | 19.803 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.288 | 509.222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 | 12645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1733 | 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 | 12645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1733 | 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 343 | 3677 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Pascal |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | GP106B |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 | 15 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 1334 | 385 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $237.11 | |
Price now | $229.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 49.49 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1708 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | 4,275 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 133.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 4,400 million |
CUDA cores | 1280 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
Surround | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |